End SD's State Food Tax with SB104

It's time to phase down to end the state’s grocery tax. We have known for years that South Dakota needs to stop taxing groceries.

Now Senate Bill 104 would end the state’s portion of the grocery tax by stepping it down over 5 years. Great idea!

In families with limited budgets for food, the grocery tax is taking food off tables.

Starting with Senators, please ask state legislators to support SB104 in this 2021 legislative session.

-- 36 states and DC do not tax groceries. SD is one of only 4 taxing at the full rate with no offset. (Alabama, Mississippi, Kansas, SD) Notably, none of SD’s neighbor states tax groceries, so SD loses businesses and loses tax revenue because SD’ans shop just outside our borders. This is especially the case in the SE corner of the state.

-- Several other states have used this phase-down method to end or reduce their food tax. Examples: GA, SC, NC, and WV ended their state food tax. Arkansas and Missouri are now less than 1.5%.

-- SB 104 would leave the tax on pop, candy and prepared food.

-- Groceries would still be taxed by cities. (2% in most towns)

-- Revenue is expected to continue to grow, even with this tax reduction, so that revenue growth will cover for ending this unfair tax without affecting current state programs.

-- How much is your own food tax? Multiply the weekly cost of your family's food by 3.38. That's how much you would save over a year without state and city food tax.

(52 weeks x .065 sales tax rate = 3.38)

-- South Dakota is recognized as one of 5 states with the most unfairtax systems, taking a bigger share of income from struggling households than from wealthier ones. The food tax is the most regressive part of sales tax.

-- Refund programs do not work. South Dakota tried one for several years. It missed approximately 98% of low-income South Dakotans.

-- Historic note, recent history:

For 16 years you have been paying higher tax on your groceries in order to make it possible for South Dakota to tax online sales. Back in 2003, tax rules were changed to follow "sales tax streamlining" rules to allow for taxing online sales, but the collateral damage was an increase in the food tax, only food. Some legislators said back then that they would cut the food tax when the state finally receives this new revenue. Now South Dakota is receiving millions in revenue from taxing online sakes. So now the legislature should recognize the sacrifice grocery shoppers have made for this and start reducing the food tax.

-- Food stamp(SNAP) purchases are not taxed (thankfully!). Doesn't that solve the problem? No: Many low-income households do not get SNAP. Those who do are expected to buy some of their food with cash. Those who are able to increase their earnings enough to get off SNAP get a double whammy: No food assistance and now tax on all their groceries.

-- Food is a big expense for nursing homes. They need this tax relief.

-- Hunger in South Dakota: According to Feeding South Dakota, One out of every nine South Dakotans is food insecure. Worse, for children it’s one in six. These are our neighbors who do not have enough food to make it through the month. Part of their scarce income goes for the tax. Taxing groceries is only one of the causes of hunger in our state, but it is one.

-- As people of faith and as people of good will, surely we are called to respond to our neighbors in need. No one should have to pay a tax before they can eat.

Also, thousands of low-income SD workers need Medicaid expansion. The governor and state legislators are holding it in their hands. Let’s ask them to open their hands to the needy in our land. (Deuteronomy 15:11)

To find your state legislators, go to sdlegislature.gov/Legislators

Info from Bread for the World-SD